Subject	Not to argue but there were some new mustangs and camaros >>
Posted by	SlicktopTT on February 19, 2002 at 5:41 PM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	I ran 9.59 1/8s in my stock slicktop n/a.. your 60fts are hi (n/m) posted by Brad (JSpecZ32) on February 19, 2002 at 05:02 PM
Message	that weren't pulling a 9.5. Hell, a souped up M3 only pulled a 9.22. You're either a hell of a driver or the times must be wrong.
Follow Ups	Questions about my times at the track >> - SlicktopTT 16:40:51 02/19/02 60ft sux big time! Get Drag radial or MT to get low ET. (n/m) - timz 16:43:38 02/19/02 Yup - no T-Tops :) (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Sideways) 16:43:39 02/19/02 I ran an 8.5@89 with just filter, ecu, and 2.1 60' on 93 oct (n/m) - NONOV8 16:46:18 02/19/02 That's what I'm talking about >>> - SlicktopTT 16:56:22 02/19/02 Forget ET for a moment, look at trap speed - Marshall 18:42:08 02/19/02 I ran 9.59 1/8s in my stock slicktop n/a.. your 60fts are hi (n/m) - Brad (JSpecZ32) 17:02:19 02/19/02 Not to argue but there were some new mustangs and camaros >> - SlicktopTT 17:41:21 02/19/02 I ran 9.6-9.8s at 2 different tracks all season.. - Brad (JSpecZ32) 20:43:06 02/19/02 Did you ever figure what was causing you to lose so much hp? - U ZCREAM (Mr. Sarcastic) 17:19:28 02/19/02 No I haven't found anything>>> - SlicktopTT 17:38:13 02/19/02 I ran about the same in my 2+2 NA, on street tires - F8IZHIS 17:40:25 02/19/02 Yeah, you are only running Stage 3 times - Marshall 18:39:18 02/19/02 Re: Yeah, you are only running Stage 3 times - voodoo 18:49:31 02/19/02 Must be the Kuhmos =] (n/m) - Fokker 18:48:57 02/19/02 With that 60' & 1/8,I project a 1/4 mile time of 14.0 @ 105. (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 18:53:24 02/19/02 I ran almost identical 60ft, 1/8mi mph and ET > - kZtt (zedparts.com) 21:59:14 02/19/02 I knew it! :-) (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 06:17:26 02/20/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.